Are there two different process graphic layout algorithms?

[ZengXi2099]

When using DeepSeek process assistant to generate process graphics, the layout of node connections is significantly different from using Slickflow.Graph library. Is the graphs generated by the Graph template component library processed using the different layout algorithm?

The first process flowchart by using Slickflow.Graph template library:

The second process flowchart by using Slickflow.AI library:

[slickflow-support]

At present, the project includes two different styles of graphic layout algorithms, the first graph above is Slickflow The Graph project includes algorithms that generate process graphics based on domain languages, and the second graph as well as algorithms that implement automatic layout based on process DeepSeek AI assistants.

The reason for the existence of these two algorithms is that the data sources and formats used to generate process graphics are different.

Slickflow. Graph uses domain programming syntax to generate graphics nodes while utilizing stack technology to store position information.

The DeepSeek AI assistance uses the automatic layout algorithms to calculate finaly the layout of the graphics based on the set of nodes and connections together.