Remove backingServiceSelector from the CRD spec

[DhritiShikhar]

Remove backingServiceSelector in favour of backingServiceSelectors

[Avni-Sharma]

Shall we address it when we are breaking the API by changing the Kind and the Group?
Also, shall we change to applications and services altogether along with the Kind and group change?

[sbose78]

Yes, let's address this altogether when we break th API.

[sbose78]

This might break the UI I think?

[DhritiShikhar]

Yes, we can solve this when we want to break the API.. but yes, this is something that should be fixed.

[DhritiShikhar]

because having two fields backingServiceSelector and backingServiceSelectors is confusing and we have to handle two cases.

[sbose78]

Right! Thanks for tracking this closely.
On a related note, we should probably use [ group, version, kind, name ] instead of [ group, version, kind, resourceRef ] ?

[DhritiShikhar]

@sbose78

Yes. +1 We should use name instead of resourceRef for both application and serviceSelector

[Avni-Sharma]

cc @akashshinde This is a subtask of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/APPSVC-574 . Hence assigning this issue to you.

[pedjak]

Fixed in #608