Regression on privacy field of struct used in `..some_struct` syntax

[estebank]

In a recent PR #69942 I made a change to unify the wording of multiple privacy errors, but accidentally regressed the following case:

error[E0451]: field `secret_uid` of struct `foo::S` is private
  --> $DIR/functional-struct-update-respects-privacy.rs:28:49
   |
LL |     let s_2 = foo::S { b: format!("ess two"), ..s_1 }; // FRU ...
   |                                                 ^^^ private field

used to be

error[E0451]: field `secret_uid` of struct `foo::S` is private
  --> $DIR/functional-struct-update-respects-privacy.rs:28:49
   |
LL |     let s_2 = foo::S { b: format!("ess two"), ..s_1 }; // FRU ...
   |                                                 ^^^ field `secret_uid` is private

This one change needs to be reversed while keeping the rest.

[mlodato517]

Hi! Could I give this issue a shot?

[jeremystucki]

I am sorry @mlodato517. I forgot to claim the issue

[mlodato517]

No worries :-)