Describe the bug
JIT error flagged by tests in dev branch
"E AssertionError: assert 'Processing JIT 5 / Matrix([[{\\mathbf{v}}_{ 0,1}(N.x, N.y)/{\\mathbf{v}}_{ 0 }(N.x, N.y)], [N.x*exp(N.x*N.y)]])' in ['Expanded functions for compilation:', '0: Matrix([[{ \\hspace{ 0.02pt } {\\mathbf{v}} }_{ 0 }(N.x, N.y)], [{ \\hspac...ndaries: 2:3', 'BSPNY 1 jacobians: 3:4', 'BSPNY 1 boundary_res: 4:5', 'BSPNY 1 boundary_jac: 5:6']"
I think this is a change in the output style of the JIT debug strings but this does need to be fixed in the tests as well. Some filtering might be needed if we are going to include the random string in the assertion.
Describe the bug
JIT error flagged by tests in dev branch
"E AssertionError: assert 'Processing JIT 5 / Matrix([[{\\mathbf{v}}_{ 0,1}(N.x, N.y)/{\\mathbf{v}}_{ 0 }(N.x, N.y)], [N.x*exp(N.x*N.y)]])' in ['Expanded functions for compilation:', '0: Matrix([[{ \\hspace{ 0.02pt } {\\mathbf{v}} }_{ 0 }(N.x, N.y)], [{ \\hspac...ndaries: 2:3', 'BSPNY 1 jacobians: 3:4', 'BSPNY 1 boundary_res: 4:5', 'BSPNY 1 boundary_jac: 5:6']"I think this is a change in the output style of the JIT debug strings but this does need to be fixed in the tests as well. Some filtering might be needed if we are going to include the random string in the assertion.