feat: Add FIM coupling for single phase fracture ALM #3961
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
npillardou
requested review from
castelletto1,
frankfeifan,
jhuang2601 and
rrsettgast
as code owners
npillardou
force-pushed
the
feature/npillardou/SinglePhasePoromechanicsConformingFracturesALM-FullyImplicit
branch
from
8b2fc7f to
c381048
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR tries to draft the fully implicit coupling approach for single phase with ALM fracture feature.
Some tests have been performed with this implementation on the inclined fault case with analytical solutions and compared to the sequential iterative method:
Effective stress:
A small deviation appears in the displacement X:
For hexahedral grid:
For tetrahedral grid:
Further checks and tests are necessary to see the consistency of the method.