Source of truth in verification results#179
Open
jonasbhend wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
clairemerker
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2026
clairemerker
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good extension, thanks! :) The truth label used will be the one already set in the configs, right?
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, we don't record the truth used to produce verification results. Therefore, if you recompute evaluation with a different truth (e.g. analysis / stations), the intermediate verification files (currently
verif.ncandverif_aggregated.nc) will be overwritten. To avoid this, we propose to make intermediate verification results truth-specific. Also, this may open up the possibility to run evaluation experiments with multiple truth data sources in the future.Summary of changes