chore: Brings cla action into FusionAuth org

[brob]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated contributor agreement verification workflow tooling to improve reliability and maintainability. All existing functionality remains unchanged.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7c5b0a4d-6652-45bd-ac22-3d8495f501a2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f76cf4 and 7bba8ca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/cla.yml

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The CLA GitHub Action used in the workflow is being replaced. The old contributor-assistant/github-action implementation is swapped for fusionauth/cla-github-action, while maintaining the same configuration parameters and workflow logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CLA Workflow Action Update .github/workflows/cla.yml	Replaced GitHub Action from contributor-assistant/github-action to fusionauth/cla-github-action with pinned commit hashes; all step conditions and inputs remain unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• chore: First steps toward CLA signing #2830: Modifies the same CLA workflow configuration by introducing the initial contributor-assistant/github-action integration that this PR now replaces with fusionauth/cla-github-action.

Suggested reviewers

• mooreds
• ucatbas
• omer-topal

Poem

🐰 A action we swap, from old to new,
FusionAuth's touch makes CLA shine through,
Same conditions, same tokens in place,
Just a smoother, more modern grace! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: replacing the CLA GitHub Action with FusionAuth's version, which involves moving the CLA action into the FusionAuth organization.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch cla

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.95%. Comparing base (95ed680) to head (7bba8ca).
⚠️ Report is 50 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2836      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.61%   82.95%   +0.34%     
==========================================
  Files          74       74              
  Lines        8154     8500     +346     
==========================================
+ Hits         6736     7050     +314     
- Misses        897      913      +16     
- Partials      521      537      +16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.