tinyretropad: Add version 2026.06.29#18213
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request adds a new Scoop manifest file, Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Suggested labels: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@bucket/tinyretropad.json`:
- Around line 3-6: The TinyRetroPad manifest is missing the required linked
package-request issue reference and explicit maintainer approval exception.
Update the manifest metadata (for example in the description or notes of the
tinyretropad entry) to include the package-request issue link, and ensure the
request is clearly marked as approved by a maintainer since the upstream has no
formal releases.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 70385dbb-ed1f-4664-b608-955405388a8d
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
bucket/tinyretropad.json
|
/verify |
|
All changes look good. Wait for review from human collaborators. tinyretropad
|
|
/merge 😄 |
| "description": "A Notepad-style Windows text editor written in x86 assembly, in roughly 2.5 KB.", | ||
| "homepage": "https://github.com/plummersSoftwareLLC/TinyRetroPad", | ||
| "license": "Apache-2.0", | ||
| "notes": "Upstream ships no releases; this manifest is pinned to a commit and versioned by its date. Built with Crinkler compression, so it may be flagged as a false positive by antivirus.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Criteria
- Latest stable version
Better to wait for upstream to merge the release PR before adding it to extras.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I dont think its that kind of project.
Running out of time to create an issue, so, take it or leave it :) issue made at #18214
<manifest-name[@version]|chore>: <general summary of the pull request>