Skip to content

Feat/skctl simulation details 59#232

Open
ajita-asthana wants to merge 4 commits intoacrlabs:mainfrom
ajita-asthana:feat/skctl-simulation-details-59
Open

Feat/skctl simulation details 59#232
ajita-asthana wants to merge 4 commits intoacrlabs:mainfrom
ajita-asthana:feat/skctl-simulation-details-59

Conversation

@ajita-asthana
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Related Links

Issue 59

Description and Rationale

  • Added skctl simulation list command to display available or currently running simulations
    → Makes it easier for users to discover simulations without querying lower-level resources

  • Added skctl simulation info command to show detailed metadata about a specific simulation
    → Improves visibility into simulation state, configuration, and runtime details

  • Enhanced CLI output formatting for better readability
    → Reduces friction when debugging or inspecting simulations from the command line

How

  • Introduced new subcommands under the simulation namespace in skctl
  • Wired command handlers into the CLI using the existing command structure (clap-based parsing)
  • Reused existing simulation data sources and extended them to expose additional fields where needed
  • Structured output to provide a clear summary (list) and detailed view (info)

@drmorr0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

drmorr0 commented Mar 30, 2026

Hi @ajita-asthana, thanks for the PR! Can you confirm this wasn't generated with Claude Code/Copilot/other LLM-based tools?

@ajita-asthana
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@drmorr0 . I did use LLMs to learn a bit about rust and how to navigate the cli commands like crate.

@drmorr0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

drmorr0 commented Mar 31, 2026

@ajita-asthana our policy is just around code generation for simkube itself. If you were just using it for learning the language/tooling that should be fine. You can read more in the README or in our developer guide.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants