Document existence of the alpine linux package#127
Open
maxf130 wants to merge 1 commit intoanatol:masterfrom
Open
Document existence of the alpine linux package#127maxf130 wants to merge 1 commit intoanatol:masterfrom
maxf130 wants to merge 1 commit intoanatol:masterfrom
Conversation
maxf130
force-pushed
the
document-alpine-package
branch
from
d3f1c0c to
3f27dcb
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've packaged up pacoloco for alpine linux. My motivation was to run pacoloco as a caching pacman proxy on a raspberry pi. For the longest time I was using Arch Linux ARM for the purpose (naturally) but this became unworkable eventually for .
Alpine is lightweight, supports aarch64 well and is philosophically not far from Arch. There were already Arch Linux related packages in Alpine (pacman for instance) and vice versa (abuild for instance), so this seems appropriate.
I note the docker image for pacoloco is based on Alpine anyway. Which, speaking of, would it be desirable for that to use the alpine package? Probably not, I smell infinite recursion.