Skip to content

Conversation

@tmater
Copy link

@tmater tmater commented Jan 5, 2026

Add private constructor to UuidType singleton.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@lidavidm lidavidm added bug-fix PRs that fix a big. labels Jan 6, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 18.4.0 milestone Jan 6, 2026
Copy link
Member

@lidavidm lidavidm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All builds fail:

Error:  Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.14.0:compile (default-compile) on project arrow-vector: Compilation failure: Compilation failure: 
Error:  /build/vector/src/main/java/org/apache/arrow/vector/UuidVector.java:[72,52] error: UuidType() has private access in UuidType
Error:  /build/vector/src/main/java/org/apache/arrow/vector/UuidVector.java:[102,52] error: UuidType() has private access in UuidType

@tmater
Copy link
Author

tmater commented Jan 7, 2026

All builds fail:

Error:  Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.14.0:compile (default-compile) on project arrow-vector: Compilation failure: Compilation failure: 
Error:  /build/vector/src/main/java/org/apache/arrow/vector/UuidVector.java:[72,52] error: UuidType() has private access in UuidType
Error:  /build/vector/src/main/java/org/apache/arrow/vector/UuidVector.java:[102,52] error: UuidType() has private access in UuidType

Thank you for looking into it @lidavidm.
I thought I ran a local build 😅.
Fully updated the UuidType usage.

Copy link
Contributor

@jhrotko jhrotko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Member

@lidavidm lidavidm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll let JB handle merging

Copy link
Member

@jbonofre jbonofre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Do you mind to rebase in order to have CI happy ?

@tmater tmater force-pushed the uuidtype_singleton branch from 530d5a8 to cd32ddb Compare January 9, 2026 08:27
@tmater
Copy link
Author

tmater commented Jan 9, 2026

LGTM.

Do you mind to rebase in order to have CI happy ?

Thank you for the review!
Not at all, rebased.

@jbonofre
Copy link
Member

jbonofre commented Jan 9, 2026

@tmater thanks ! I just ran the CI, I will merge as soon as it's all green.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug-fix PRs that fix a big.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants