feat: Register LumaTrace (ID 26)#37
Conversation
feat: register LumaTrace (ID 26)
fix: correct json schema format
jcollomosse
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for this contribution which will be reviewed at the next meeting of the watermarking task force (Feb 4). To expedite merging of this contribution please can you take the following actions:
To conform to the entry schema please provide an email address within the 'contact' field rather than a URL.
Please can you confirm your relationship to the lumatrace.org namespace?
fix: update contact to email and align namespace with es.domain
|
@jcollomosse Thank you. I have updated the submission as requested:
Ready for the Feb 4 meeting. |
docs(registry): update es.lumatrace metadata to v4.0 reference implementation" -m "- Update informationalUrl to point to the new multi-module repository structure. - Refine description to highlight the Java Core library and Cloud Soft-Binding API capabilities.
|
Thanks for the entry and the changes @Cyrah2R, I added a review and will bring this to the group for our next meeting on Feb 4. |
Removed the trailing period from the description in entryMetadata.
|
Thank you for the approvals. I have just pushed a fix to address the description_trailing_period linting error by removing the periods from the description fields, ensuring full compliance with the repository's style guidelines. |
|
Thanks for fixing the description @Cyrah2R. The WM TF session was postponed to January 18, the team will review your entry then. Thanks for your patience. |
|
Thanks for the update! I appreciate the heads-up. I am standing by for the review. Just a note regarding the failing check: it seems to be flagging an issue in Best regards. |
No worries about this one @Cyrah2R this is an issue unrelated to your submission and there is a PR to address it already. We will be reviewing your entry today, if you have an opportunity to join the meeting that would be great. |
|
One remaining question we have @Cyrah2R is whether the submitted watermarking technology is capable of embedding an identifier? This was not obvious looking at the documentation but is a requirement to be added to the list of supported algorithm as this is key to support C2PA manifest recovery. |
|
Hi @domguinard, Thank you for the feedback and for raising this important question. To clarify: Yes, the LumaTrace technology is specifically designed to embed a unique 64-bit identifier, which is the cornerstone of our support for C2PA manifest recovery through "Soft Binding." As seen in our submitted lumatrace-core and lumatrace-cloud modules, the mechanism works as follows:
LumaTrace was built to be platform-agnostic (Pure Java/Kotlin) to ensure it can serve as a reliable reference implementation for C2PA provenance in both cloud and mobile environments. I look forward to discussing the payload bit-depth and the recovery workflow in today's meeting. Best regards, Cyrah |
domguinard
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Accepted by the WM TF during TF meeting.
|
@Cyrah2R your algorithm has been approved and added to the list, welcome and congratulations. |
|
Thank you so much, @domguinard! It’s a huge honor to have the algorithm approved and to officially contribute to the list. I'm thrilled to be part of this ecosystem and looking forward to continuing to build and improve digital provenance solutions. Cheers!! |
Registering LumaTrace algorithm (ID 26).
Description: Java-native Adaptive Spatial Watermarking robust against cropping. License: MIT Maintainer: @Cyrah2R