enable unit tests for all supported python versions#442
Open
MoralCode wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
this marks future ones as not required to pass for now Signed-off-by: Adrian Edwards <adredwar@redhat.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR enables the unit test matrices to run for all supported python versions
this marks future python versions (where we dont yet know if things work) as not required to pass for now
This will help us evaluate whether the changes from #439 will basically give us python 3.13 support for free or not
Notes for Reviewers
The testing will be running this in the PR when the CI runs
Signed commits
Generative AI disclosure
Please select one option:
If AI tools were used, please provide details below:
- What tools were used? Sonnet 4.6 Medium
- How were these tools used? writing the code
- Did you review these outputs before submitting this PR? code review looks ok