[main] Enhance "service" command for multiple service bindings #3658
+47
−9
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* in the "bound apps" section, show also multiple service bindings for an app * add binding guid and created_at timestamp to table * sort by 1. name 2. created_at
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of the Change
Enhance "service" command to display information for multiple service bindings. Example output for a service that is bound to 3 apps 2 times each:
Why Is This PR Valuable?
Supports management of multiple service bindings per (app, service) which is useful for rotating credentials.
Applicable Issues
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/community/blob/main/toc/rfc/rfc-0040-service-binding-rotation.md#cf-cli
How Urgent Is The Change?
Not super-urgent.
Other Relevant Parties
This change is for the next major release of CLI (v9). TBD: Should the same change be implemented for v8?