Bootstrap module analysis

[deweyjose]

Remove the bootstrap module and vendor the GeneratedCodeGenConfigBuilder to simplify the project structure and reduce build complexity.

---

  

[cursor]

Cursor Agent can help with this pull request. Just @cursor in comments and I'll start working on changes in this branch.
_{Learn more about Cursor Agents}

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Report

Overall Project	88.56%	🍏
Files changed	100%	🍏

File	Coverage
IntrospectionRequest.java	100%	🍏
CodeGenConfigBuilder.java	100%	🍏
TypeMappingService.java	96.55%	🍏
SchemaTransformationService.java	95.79%	🍏
SchemaManifestService.java	93.43%	🍏
RemoteSchemaService.java	93.38%	🍏
SchemaFileService.java	91.93%	🍏
CodegenExecutor.java	84.35%	🍏
ParameterMap.java	71.43%	🍏
Logger.java	15.38%	🍏
Constants.java	0%	🍏
Codegen.java	0%	🍏

[deweyjose]

@cursoragent this is great but one bit - I don't think we need to use the "Generated" prefixes for the builder now. Can you look at renaming the class and package it with the other source files?

[cursor]

Great call — I went ahead and did exactly that.

✅ Renamed and relocated

• Old: io.github.deweyjose.codegen.generated.GeneratedCodeGenConfigBuilder
• New: io.github.deweyjose.graphqlcodegen.CodeGenConfigBuilder

File moved to:

• graphqlcodegen-maven-plugin/src/main/java/io/github/deweyjose/graphqlcodegen/CodeGenConfigBuilder.java

✅ Updated usages/docs

• CodegenExecutor now uses new CodeGenConfigBuilder()
• Removed old generated-package/class reference
• Updated README.md + Agents.md references to the new class/location

✅ Validation

• Ran: ./mvnw -pl graphqlcodegen-maven-plugin test
• Result: PASS (47 tests, 0 failures)

Pushed in commit:

• 060de01