Add CYCLE clause support for recursive CTEs - #134
Open
heinrichf-cdgnm wants to merge 7 commits into
Open
Conversation
heinrichf-cdgnm
force-pushed
the
cycle-clause
branch
from
August 11, 2026 10:08
69d22bd to
e9d1d1a
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Pushed some cleanup on top.
|
Contributor
|
@heinrichf-cdgnm Thank you for the contribution! I intend to review and hope to get this merged, but have been on vacation recently and am swamped with other work currently. Will get to it as soon as I can. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Converting the USING path column to Python is involved with psycopg2. psycopg3 will convert it to a list of string tuples. I tried my best to document this in the code and in the docs.
The columns the clause adds are read through cte.col, e.g. .annotate(is_cycle=cte.col.is_cycle).
Closes #96