Conversation
|
Yea, you are right. I think we could start with this:
Each of them should be checked if it really is a component. |
|
Cool, but I'm just about a document structure for each component, e.g. signature, description, code etc. |
|
Then we can start to create a real doc files for the functions and components |
|
Aha, ok. Let’s referes to the Dash app and examples from Drupal, Phalcon, Laravel, etc world.
|
|
OK, so I'll install Dash now and check it out |
|
I believe we can also teach ourselves and others by using principles that Hoa (http://hoa-project.net/En/Literature.html) used
So each component has theory sections and also practical sections, sections that describes a components from practical point of view I think will be differ from component to component. |
|
Hmm...sounds cool, but I think we have to start with more simple solution for the moment and then create this like a new feature. What do you think? |
|
The main difference between "Subsystem" and "Component" from developer's view that |
But I'm talking about that section titles will be differ from component to component. I think we could have
|
|
Looks good, are you able to create some example MD file, like I've did for functions? |
|
I’ll try later today.
|
|
OK, let's leave this pull request open until we'll finish with that point |
|
BTW, are you OK with a template for functions? |
We have to figure out about a template for components
For this we need to know a basic elements of documentation which we need