Draft
Conversation
stiga-huang
reviewed
Jun 23, 2022
| accessors.add(readUsingUnsafe(field)); | ||
| } catch (RuntimeException e) { | ||
| LOG.warn("The JVM is preventing Ehcache from accessing the subgraph beneath '{}'" + | ||
| " - cache sizes may be underestimated as a result", field, e); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I test this PR and found the logs are full of this warning. I think we should only log this if unsafe fails. Otherwise, it's confusing since we are actually not understimating the size.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@chrisdennis Could you please address this? I tested the latest version in Impala. The logs are still full of such warnings:
W1012 12:40:35.496349 2656 ObjectGraphWalker.java:220] 4a48697e1f87e06d:102ed89f00000000] The JVM is preventing Ehcache from accessing the subgraph beneath 'final jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.ucp' - cache sizes may be underestimated as a result
Java exception follows:
java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field final jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.ucp accessible: module java.base does not "opens jdk.internal.loader" to unnamed module @10823d72
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:340)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:280)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Field.checkCanSetAccessible(Field.java:176)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Field.setAccessible(Field.java:170)
at org.ehcache.sizeof.ObjectGraphWalker.readUsingReflection(ObjectGraphWalker.java:232)
at org.ehcache.sizeof.ObjectGraphWalker.getFilteredFields(ObjectGraphWalker.java:214)
at org.ehcache.sizeof.ObjectGraphWalker.walk(ObjectGraphWalker.java:162)
at org.ehcache.sizeof.SizeOf.deepSizeOf(SizeOf.java:83)
at org.apache.impala.catalog.local.CatalogdMetaProvider$SizeOfWeigher.weigh(CatalogdMetaProvider.java:2014)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.setValue(LocalCache.java:2010)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.replace(LocalCache.java:2956)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache.replace(LocalCache.java:4258)
at org.apache.impala.catalog.local.CatalogdMetaProvider.loadWithCaching(CatalogdMetaProvider.java:542)
at org.apache.impala.catalog.local.CatalogdMetaProvider.loadIcebergApiTable(CatalogdMetaProvider.java:1058)
at org.apache.impala.catalog.local.LocalIcebergTable.loadIcebergTableViaMetaProvider(LocalIcebergTable.java:90)
at org.apache.impala.catalog.local.LocalTable.load(LocalTable.java:116)
at org.apache.impala.catalog.local.LocalDb.getTable(LocalDb.java:127)
at org.apache.impala.analysis.StmtMetadataLoader.getMissingTables(StmtMetadataLoader.java:310)
at org.apache.impala.analysis.StmtMetadataLoader.loadTables(StmtMetadataLoader.java:165)
at org.apache.impala.analysis.StmtMetadataLoader.loadTables(StmtMetadataLoader.java:141)
at org.apache.impala.service.Frontend.doCreateExecRequest(Frontend.java:2014)
at org.apache.impala.service.Frontend.getTExecRequest(Frontend.java:1926)
at org.apache.impala.service.Frontend.createExecRequest(Frontend.java:1748)
at org.apache.impala.service.JniFrontend.createExecRequest(JniFrontend.java:164)
Can we simply remove this log since the following accessor got from readUsingUnsafe() will work?
|
Can we reopen #65 and merge it for 0.4.1 release? It's much simpler than this PR so I think can be merged easier than this. |
|
@chrisdennis do you see a chance, to get this merged and to solve the java-9+ problems? questioning, if ehcache is still using this library and - if not - what else? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a PoC for Java 9+ (up to current Java 18) support. We don't have to use the ByteBuddy agent implementation verbatim, but it proves that things can be made to work.