-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 403
Propose hosting ember-mcp #1164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Hosting it would definitely improve adoption in my org. We discourage running It would be nicer if it was hosted on an official domain and submitted to the MCP registries, so we could trust it and install it from our various AI tools' marketplaces. Not sure if this RFC covers both the hosting and the tools published by the MCP. On the tool front, I don't know if Ember MCP should have generic npm ecosystem tools like |
| `ember-mcp` loads and indexes aggregated Ember documentation at startup (API docs, Guides, community content, examples) from: | ||
|
|
||
| `https://nullvoxpopuli.github.io/ember-ai-information-aggregator/llms-full.txt` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm fine calling it initial datasource. They are subject to change anyway. I know there are a couple of community writings (done/happening) and a future consolidation of these resources under the official ember banner will then naturally turn into the datasource.
gossi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Happy with that one. Even more about an officially hosted one ;)
|
on: https://www.netlify.com/blog/web-frameworks-2025-year-in-review/
We have one, and anyone using AI with ember, I would tell them to use the ember-mcp -- hopefully we can recommend it formally soon 🤞 |
Co-authored-by: Edward Faulkner <edward@eaf4.com>
|
Huge thumbs up. Ember with skills and mcp is creating such a stable dev solution for us. Would be great to have it official. |
|
Very happy to see this happening! It will definitely help Ember.js adoption and DX! |
Propose hosting ember-mcp
Rendered
Summary
This pull request is proposing a new RFC.
To succeed, it will need to pass into the Exploring Stage, followed by the Accepted Stage.
A Proposed or Exploring RFC may also move to the Closed Stage if it is withdrawn by the author or if it is rejected by the Ember team. This requires an "FCP to Close" period.
An FCP is required before merging this PR to advance to Accepted.
Upon merging this PR, automation will open a draft PR for this RFC to move to the Ready for Released Stage.
Exploring Stage Description
This stage is entered when the Ember team believes the concept described in the RFC should be pursued, but the RFC may still need some more work, discussion, answers to open questions, and/or a champion before it can move to the next stage.
An RFC is moved into Exploring with consensus of the relevant teams. The relevant team expects to spend time helping to refine the proposal. The RFC remains a PR and will have an
Exploringlabel applied.An Exploring RFC that is successfully completed can move to Accepted with an FCP is required as in the existing process. It may also be moved to Closed with an FCP.
Accepted Stage Description
To move into the "accepted stage" the RFC must have complete prose and have successfully passed through an "FCP to Accept" period in which the community has weighed in and consensus has been achieved on the direction. The relevant teams believe that the proposal is well-specified and ready for implementation. The RFC has a champion within one of the relevant teams.
If there are unanswered questions, we have outlined them and expect that they will be answered before Ready for Release.
When the RFC is accepted, the PR will be merged, and automation will open a new PR to move the RFC to the Ready for Release stage. That PR should be used to track implementation progress and gain consensus to move to the next stage.
Checklist to move to Exploring
S-Proposedis removed from the PR and the labelS-Exploringis added.Checklist to move to Accepted
Final Comment Periodlabel has been added to start the FCP