Add kernelCTF CVE-2025-38000_lts_cos_mitigation#296
Add kernelCTF CVE-2025-38000_lts_cos_mitigation#296mingi wants to merge 5 commits intogoogle:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Hey! If I compile the stable version of the patch commit (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=93c276942e75de0e5bc91576300d292e968f5a02) with KASAN and run the exploit, it still crashes the kernel. Can you help us understand why is that? Is this the right patch commit? (This blocks the payout of the first half of the reward.) Logs: |
|
Hi! When the vulnerability was reported, the maintainer first created the patch 93c27694. After realizing this patch did not fix the vulnerability, they created another patch to prevent UAF (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/? id=103406b38c600fec1fe375a77b27d87e314aea09). |
|
Hey! Unfortunately, the kernelCTF panel determined that commit 103406b - rather than yours - was the official patch fixing the vulnerability. Since that commit had already been claimed by another researcher, we cannot attribute it to you. We encourage all researchers to ensure that the vulnerabilities they report are correctly fixed by the kernel; the panel concluded that this requirement was not met in this instance. |
|
Hi! I don't think it's fair to give all the credit to the commit 103406b. This is because I reported this vulnerability first, and Lion created a new patch based on publicly available information during the vulnerability patching process. I identified that the initially applied commit 3f98113 was insufficient and notified the maintainer as I mentioned in Discord. Meanwhile, Lion simultaneously reported the patch. Therefore, Lion was able to create the fix because I reported the vulnerability. It is unreasonable that the vulnerability founder receives no credit at all. |
|
Hey! We will discuss this on our next panel meeting (next Tuesday). |
|
Good news! The panel decided that we are making an exception in this case and accept your submission. But won't accept this in the future and we've added the following clause to the rules:
|
|
Thank you for sharing the good news! I’ll be more careful next time. |
No description provided.