[util] use more items to make code more concise

[joshlf]

---

• 　 Simplify try_transmute! (and friends) internals #2938
• 👉 [util] use more items to make code more concise #2942

Latest Update: v8 — Compare vs v7

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version	v7	v6	v5	v4	v3	v2	v1	Base
v8	vs v7	vs v6	vs v5	vs v4	vs v3	vs v2	vs v1	vs Base
v7		vs v6	vs v5	vs v4	vs v3	vs v2	vs v1	vs Base
v6			vs v5	vs v4	vs v3	vs v2	vs v1	vs Base
v5				vs v4	vs v3	vs v2	vs v1	vs Base
v4					vs v3	vs v2	vs v1	vs Base
v3						vs v2	vs v1	vs Base
v2							vs v1	vs Base
v1								vs Base

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @joshlf, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the readability and conciseness of the src/util/macro_util.rs file. It achieves this by strategically adding use statements for various invariant-related types, thereby eliminating the need for explicit module qualification in the code. The change primarily impacts how these types are referenced, leading to a cleaner and more streamlined codebase without altering the underlying logic or functionality.

Highlights

• Code Conciseness: Introduced use statements for several types from the crate::pointer::invariant module to reduce verbosity in type annotations and function calls.
• Readability Improvement: Removed redundant invariant:: prefixes throughout the src/util/macro_util.rs file, making the code cleaner and easier to read.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request is a nice refactoring that improves code conciseness in src/util/macro_util.rs. By importing more items from crate::pointer::invariant directly, you've successfully removed the invariant:: prefix in many places. This makes the code cleaner and easier to read. The changes are purely stylistic and have been applied correctly throughout the file. The code is now more idiomatic. I have no further suggestions as the changes are correct and beneficial.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.30%. Comparing base (84eaf29) to head (bc1e613).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2942      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.30%   92.30%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          19       19              
  Lines        5849     5846       -3     
==========================================
- Hits         5399     5396       -3     
  Misses        450      450              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.