BE-537, BE-537: hgraph: REST `/hashql` endpoint with E2E tests by indietyp · Pull Request #8827 · hashintel/hash

indietyp · 2026-06-04T16:33:47Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Add first-class /hashql POST endpoint. HashQlResource with OpenApi integration. CompilerContext with HeapPool/ScratchPool for memory management. CLI-configurable pool sizes via CompilerConfig with PoolSize newtype. PostgresStorePool extraction pattern. Interactive and Json-Compat header support. E2E tests via httpYac.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

vercel · 2026-06-04T16:33:49Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 3, 2026 4:34pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 3, 2026 4:34pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Jul 3, 2026 4:34pm

cursor · 2026-06-04T16:34:01Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
New query surface executes compiled SQL against Postgres with configurable resource pools; misconfiguration or compiler bugs could affect availability, though inputs are restricted and errors are structured.

Overview
Adds a POST /hashql route that accepts a JExpr query body, runs the full HashQL pipeline (parse through Postgres codegen), executes via the eval orchestrator, and returns structured success/advisory or diagnostic errors.

Server wiring: Startup builds a shared CompilerContext (bounded/unbounded heap and scratch pools plus a LocalPoolHandle for !Send work on pinned threads). New CLI/env flags CompilerConfig / PoolSize control memory and exec pool sizes. The REST router gets extensions for PostgresStorePool, the compiler context, and OpenAPI documents the endpoint. Temporal host is ignored when empty.

API behavior: Request requires query and an empty inputs array for now. Optional Interactive (HTML error rendering) and Json-Compat (plain JSON values in the envelope) headers mirror existing REST patterns. PostgresStore gains AsRef<Client> for HashQL execution; sym::main is registered for lowering.

Tests: tests/hashql.http and test.sh cover happy path, parse errors, validation, json-compat, and interactive HTML errors.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 2ad9682. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

github-actions · 2026-06-11T13:40:21Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 258 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.791 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.081 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.900 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 145 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.244 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.787 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.627 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.449 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.170 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.879 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.754 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.558 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.410 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.411 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.209 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.915 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.684 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.965 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$54.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.846 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$47.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 318 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.026 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$51.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.635 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.013 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$62.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 368 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.977 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$62.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 399 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$57.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 388 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 625 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.214 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$46.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.337 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$294 \mathrm{ms} \pm 870 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.549 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.617 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$24.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.935 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.352 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.806 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.512 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 120 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.487 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.394 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$34.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.758 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.186 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.262 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$36.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.818 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.378 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$92.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 665 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.301 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 863 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.997 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$99.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 643 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 634 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.299 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 600 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.247 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$125 \mathrm{ms} \pm 635 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.635 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 452 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.551 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 636 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.451 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 575 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.228 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 644 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.417 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 664 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.514 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 606 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.793 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$189 \mathrm{ms} \pm 777 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.133 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$150 \mathrm{ms} \pm 603 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.399 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$40.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.510 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$582 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.06 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

+/// Request body for the `/hashql` endpoint.
+#[derive(serde::Deserialize, utoipa::ToSchema)]
+pub(crate) struct HashQlRequest {
+    #[schema(value_type = serde_json::Value)]
+    query: Arc<RawValue>,
+    /// Input values for the query. Must be an empty list until input support ships.


Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

+                let iter = btree_map
+                    .iter()
+                    .map(|(key, value)| (Self(key), Self(value)));
+
+                // If all the keys are strings we can collect a map, otherwise we must fallback
+                // to collecting as a sequence
+                if btree_map
+                    .keys()
+                    .all(|key| matches!(key, OwnedValue::String(_)))
+                {
+                    serializer.collect_map(iter)
+                } else {
+                    serializer.collect_seq(iter)
+                }


+    let mut scratch = ctx.scratches.get();
+    let heap = ctx.heaps.get();
+
+    let inputs = Inputs::new(); // TODO: https://linear.app/hash/issue/BE-41/hashql-expose-input-in-graph-api
+
+    let Success {
+        value: compilation,
+        advisories,
+    } = Compilation::compile(&heap, &mut scratch, spans, query)?;
+
+    let context = compilation.context();


Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

+#[expect(clippy::trivially_copy_pass_by_ref)]
+fn serialize_num<S: serde::Serializer>(num: &Num, serializer: S) -> Result<S::Ok, S::Error> {
+    num.as_f64().serialize(serializer)
+}


cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

Want reviews to match your repository better? Bugbot Learning can learn team-specific rules from PR activity. A team admin can enable Learning in the Cursor dashboard.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 90037e8. Configure here.}

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

+#[utoipa::path(
+    post,
+    path = "/hashql",
+    request_body = HashQlRequest,
+    tag = "HashQL",
+    params(
+        ("Interactive" = Option<bool>, Header, description = "When true, error responses are rendered as HTML instead of JSON"),
+        ("Json-Compat" = Option<bool>, Header, description = "When true, serializes the result as plain JSON values, stripping HashQL-specific type wrappers"),
+    ),
+    responses(
+        (status = 200, content_type = "application/json", description = "Query executed successfully"),
+        (status = 400, content_type = "application/json", description = "Query compilation or validation error"),
+        (status = 500, description = "Internal compiler or database error"),
+    )


Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

+    client.assert(response.body.message !== undefined, "Expected error message");
+    client.assert(response.body.contents[0].Error.metadata.deserializationError.includes("inputs"),
+      "Expected error to mention missing 'inputs' field");


@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+use hashql_ast::error::AstDiagnosticCategory;
+use hashql_core::{


+
+use axum::response::{Html, IntoResponse as _};
+use hashql_ast::error::AstDiagnosticCategory;
+use hashql_core::span::{SpanId, SpanTable};


+use hash_graph_postgres_store::store::PostgresStorePool;
+use hash_graph_store::pool::StorePool as _;
+use hash_temporal_client::TemporalClient;
+use hashql_core::{


+use alloc::{collections::BTreeMap, sync::Arc};
+use core::alloc::Allocator;
+
+use hashql_core::id::Id as _;


+
+#[expect(clippy::trivially_copy_pass_by_ref)]
+fn serialize_ptr<S: serde::Serializer>(ptr: &Ptr, serializer: S) -> Result<S::Ok, S::Error> {
+    ptr.def().as_u32().serialize(serializer)


Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 4, 2026 16:33

graphite-app Bot assigned indietyp Jun 4, 2026

indietyp mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2026

BE-513: HashQL: Rework dynamic aggregate size estimation #8697

Merged

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of indietyp June 4, 2026 16:34 View session

indietyp mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2026

BE-427: Add hashql-macros crate with procedural macros for ID types and symbols #8495

Merged

3 tasks

indietyp marked this pull request as draft June 4, 2026 16:34

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash June 9, 2026 07:42 View deployment

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 9, 2026 09:48

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-592-hashql-remove-old-eval-graph-path-and-core-value-types branch from ffd1eee to c4c66ca Compare June 9, 2026 09:48

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-537-hashql-remove-old-backend-wire-up-hashql-in-the-api branch from 15bfd71 to 29a5989 Compare June 9, 2026 09:48

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of indietyp June 9, 2026 09:48 View session

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-592-hashql-remove-old-eval-graph-path-and-core-value-types branch from c4c66ca to b71a649 Compare June 9, 2026 09:50

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 9, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs

indietyp added 2 commits June 11, 2026 14:17

fix: suggestions from code review

1e2edd2

fix: type annotation

2ad9682

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs

indietyp mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2026

BE-481: HashQL: Reify null and empty tuple as unit constants #8853

Open

3 tasks

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs

Comment thread apps/hash-graph/src/subcommand/server.rs

indietyp mentioned this pull request Jun 16, 2026

BE-71: HashQL: Consolidate AST special-form expansion stages into one #8870

Open

3 tasks

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

cursor Bot reviewed Jun 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs

This was referenced Jun 18, 2026

BE-538: HashQL: Permission system integration #8882

Open

BE-607: HashQL: Refactor ModuleRegistry into builder/immutable split with allocator-generic stdlib construction #8887

Open

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 19, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/mod.rs

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

This was referenced Jun 22, 2026

BE-615: HashQL: Introduce the concept of synthetic closures in the MIR #8894

Open

BE-614: HashQL: Generate synthetic closure bodies for intrinsics used as first-class values #8895

Open

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/value.rs

Comment on lines +12 to +15

#[expect(clippy::trivially_copy_pass_by_ref)]

fn serialize_num<S: serde::Serializer>(num: &Num, serializer: S) -> Result<S::Ok, S::Error> {

num.as_f64().serialize(serializer)

}

cursor Bot reviewed Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/hashql/value.rs

Copilot AI reviewed Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

github-advanced-security AI found potential problems Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

Copilot AI reviewed Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

		@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
		use hashql_ast::error::AstDiagnosticCategory;
		use hashql_core::{

Uh oh!

Conversation

indietyp commented Jun 4, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Jun 4, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Jun 4, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

indietyp commented Jun 4, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel Bot commented Jun 4, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Jun 4, 2026 •

edited

Loading