Update GitHub Action andstor/file-existence-action to v3.1.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
andstor/file-existence-action	action	minor	v3.0.0 → v3.1.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

andstor/file-existence-action (andstor/file-existence-action)

v3.1.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

• feat: Add verbose mode by @​ffflorian in #​167
• Upgrade to Node 24 by @​JordanLongstaff in #​173

New Contributors

• @​ffflorian made their first contribution in #​167
• @​JordanLongstaff made their first contribution in #​173

Full Changelog: andstor/file-existence-action@v3...v3.1.0

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • "before 2am on saturday"
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 11, 2026 11:47am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 11, 2026 11:47am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 11, 2026 11:47am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Single third-party GitHub Action version pin in CI with unchanged step inputs; no application or security logic changes.

Overview
Bumps andstor/file-existence-action from v3.0.0 to v3.1.0 (pinned SHA) in .github/workflows/semgrep.yml, on the step that checks whether semgrep.sarif exists before SARIF upload.

Upstream v3.1.0 adds optional verbose mode and upgrades the action runtime to Node 24; this workflow does not change inputs, so behavior should stay the same aside from the dependency update.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3506f4b. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.73%. Comparing base (6736174) to head (3506f4b).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9010   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.73%   59.73%           
=======================================
  Files        1371     1371           
  Lines      135461   135461           
  Branches     6066     6066           
=======================================
  Hits        80911    80911           
  Misses      53618    53618           
  Partials      932      932           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	6.39% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	1.90% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.19% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	7.41% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	91.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	29.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	38.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	84.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	89.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	78.98% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	80.04% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	87.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing deps/gha/andstor-file-existence-action-3.x (3506f4b) with main (5a90775)}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.404 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.723 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 366 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.826 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$25.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.833 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.590 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.524 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.589 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.097 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.048 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.808 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.758 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.646 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.056 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.481 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.549 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.335 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.198 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.503 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.816 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.177 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.438 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.789 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.334 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$44.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.336 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$37.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$39.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.40 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}16.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$43.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.888 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$51.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 473 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.450 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$95.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 547 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.262 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 213 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.227 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$313 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.14 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}11.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.690 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.864 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.722 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.731 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.084 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.342 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.412 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.386 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.978 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.818 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.085 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.769 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.309 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.913 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.170 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.548 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.809 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.240 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$61.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 439 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 539 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.215 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$67.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 615 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$78.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 533 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.996 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$87.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 425 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.021 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$94.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 669 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.451 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$45.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.913 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$75.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 414 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.133 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$52.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 497 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.404 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 413 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.646 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 486 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.507 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 818 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.813 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 621 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.680 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$19.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-21.368 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$548 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.19 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph