Update GitHub Action aws-actions/amazon-ecr-login to v2.1.6

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
aws-actions/amazon-ecr-login	action	minor	v2.0.1 → v2.1.6

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

aws-actions/amazon-ecr-login (aws-actions/amazon-ecr-login)

v2.1.6

Compare Source

See the changelog for details about the changes included in this release.

v2.1.5

Compare Source

See the changelog for details about the changes included in this release.

v2.1.4

Compare Source

See the changelog for details about the changes included in this release.

v2.1.3

Compare Source

See the changelog for details about the changes included in this release.

v2.1.2

Compare Source

See the changelog for details about the changes included in this release.

v2.1.1

Compare Source

See the changelog for details about the changes included in this release.

v2.1.0

Compare Source

See the changelog for details about the changes included in this release.

v2.0.2

Compare Source

Features

• Add EKS Pod Identity support to Amazon ECR login action (#​624, #​735) (#​740) (dcb4c27)

2.0.2 (2026-03-13)

Bug Fixes

• Upgrade import syntax to ES Modules (#​889) (0edf37c)

2.0.1 (2023-10-02)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • "before 2am on saturday"
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 11, 2026 11:47am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 11, 2026 11:47am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 11, 2026 11:47am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Single CI dependency pin with no application code changes; risk is limited to ECR login behavior in GitHub Actions.

Overview
Bumps the pinned aws-actions/amazon-ecr-login step in the composite .github/actions/docker-ecr-login action from v2.0.1 to v2.1.6 (new commit SHA in the uses line).

Workflows that call docker-ecr-login (e.g. docker-build-push, deploy) will pick up the newer ECR login behavior on the next run; no other files change in this PR.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit df964f4. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.73%. Comparing base (6736174) to head (df964f4).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9011   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.73%   59.73%           
=======================================
  Files        1371     1371           
  Lines      135461   135461           
  Branches     6066     6066           
=======================================
+ Hits        80911    80913    +2     
+ Misses      53618    53616    -2     
  Partials      932      932           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	6.39% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	1.90% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.23% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	7.41% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	91.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	29.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	38.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	84.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	89.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	78.98% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	80.04% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	87.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing deps/gha/aws-actions-amazon-ecr-login-2.x (df964f4) with main (5a90775)}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.375 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.281 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.669 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 369 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$24.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 199 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.386 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.542 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.786 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.515 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.852 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.597 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.247 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.211 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.977 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.258 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.604 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$42.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.244 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$32.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 213 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.306 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$35.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.640 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$41.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$49.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.394 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$39.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.380 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$91.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 677 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$45.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.89 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}34.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$274 \mathrm{ms} \pm 945 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.685 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.000 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.357 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.094 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.318 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.274 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.203 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.040 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.788 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.115 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.190 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.924 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.426 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.614 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$59.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 404 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.033 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 618 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.368 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$65.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 493 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.682 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$76.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 521 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.690 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$85.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 558 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.338 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$91.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 565 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.914 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$45.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.749 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$75.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 449 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$51.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.569 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 458 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.180 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 553 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.771 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 470 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.335 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 617 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.654 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$132 \mathrm{ms} \pm 565 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$18.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$507 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.13 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-4.669 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph