Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @phroi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request establishes the foundational planning for the iCKB Stack v2 development. It introduces a comprehensive set of documentation that defines the project's scope, outlines detailed requirements, and maps out a strategic 7-phase roadmap. The included research documents provide deep dives into architectural considerations, feature prioritization, potential pitfalls, and the recommended technology stack, all aimed at guiding the migration to CCC-native APIs and the removal of legacy components. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request establishes a comprehensive planning foundation for the v1 development of iCKB Stack v2. It includes detailed research on architecture, features, pitfalls, and the technology stack, alongside a structured roadmap and requirements. The transition from the custom SmartTransaction to native CCC APIs is well-justified. However, there are several internal contradictions within the research documents—specifically regarding the Udt subclassing strategy and whether ccc.Transaction.getInputsCapacity() natively handles DAO profit—that should be resolved to ensure a consistent implementation path.
6e2427d to
35b5eec
Compare
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request establishes a comprehensive and exceptionally well-structured foundation for the v1 development effort. The newly added planning documents (PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md, ROADMAP.md, etc.) are incredibly detailed, clear, and demonstrate a deep understanding of the project's goals, architecture, and potential risks. The research summaries are particularly impressive, providing a solid rationale for the proposed architectural changes, such as the removal of SmartTransaction and the adoption of CCC-native UDT patterns. The updates to existing documentation and dependencies are consistent with the overall plan. This is an excellent piece of work that sets the project up for success. I have no specific issues to raise.
|
LGTM Phroi %153 |
Why
Establish the planning foundation for v1 development — project definition, research, requirements, and a 7-phase roadmap.
Changes
PROJECT.mdwith project definition and scopeconfig.json)REQUIREMENTS.mddefining v1 requirementsROADMAP.mdwith 7-phase implementation plan andSTATE.mdfor tracking