✨ Running builtin provider externally from a GRPC Provider #635
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
This is for 0.6 |
Signed-off-by: Pranav Gaikwad <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Hurley <[email protected]>
…ng ability to detect default and remove if additional config is found Signed-off-by: Shawn Hurley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Hurley <[email protected]>
shawn-hurley
force-pushed
the
feature/builtin-provider-apart-of-external
branch
from
f782dc1 to
b896017
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
I am closing this PR as it is very out of date and we have no intention in moving this idea forward AFAIK |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allowing for builtin to run, removing the need for shared access to the filesytem. Now only the provider will need access.
Only implemented for java provider at the moment