Skip to content

Conversation

@hargoniX
Copy link
Contributor

  • step 1
  • step 2.1

@hargoniX
Copy link
Contributor Author

!bench

@leanprover-radar
Copy link

leanprover-radar commented Dec 29, 2025

Benchmark results for ee752a7 against 2bca310 are in! @hargoniX

Large changes (2✅)
  • bv_decide_mul//instructions: -5.7G (-12.0%)
  • bv_decide_realworld//instructions: -8.9G (-35.0%)
Medium changes (3✅)
  • build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.RelabelFin//bytes .ilean: -3kiB (-21.4%)
  • build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.RelabelFin//bytes .olean.private: -54kiB (-40.5%)
  • bv_decide_mod//instructions: -13.1G (-5.7%)
Small changes (1✅, 13🟥)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Sat.AIG.CNF//instructions: +715.8M (+6.1%) (reduced significance based on *//lines)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.Basic//bytes .ilean: +5kiB (+28.8%) (reduced significance based on *//lines)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.Basic//bytes .olean: +46kiB (+50.6%) (reduced significance based on *//lines)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.Basic//bytes .olean.private: +35kiB (+22.7%) (reduced significance based on *//lines)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.Basic//bytes .olean.server: +3kiB (+29.2%) (reduced significance based on *//lines)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.Basic//instructions: +67.0M (+3.1%) (reduced significance based on *//lines)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.Dimacs//bytes .olean.private: +8kiB (+10.9%)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.Dimacs//instructions: +24.7M (+2.6%)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.Relabel//bytes .ilean: +3kiB (+26.6%) (reduced significance based on *//lines)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.Relabel//bytes .olean.private: +15kiB (+13.1%)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.RelabelFin//bytes .olean: +11kiB (+20.6%) (reduced significance based on *//lines)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.RelabelFin//bytes .olean.server: +800B (+15.5%)
  • build/module/Std.Sat.CNF.RelabelFin//instructions: -536.1M (-35.4%) (reduced significance based on absolute threshold)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Tactic.BVDecide.LRAT.Internal.Convert//instructions: +2.7G (+142.4%) (reduced significance based on *//lines)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants