chore: Add GitHub Workflow for checking the formatting#69
Merged
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR adds automated formatting checks to the CI pipeline to prevent formatting issues like #68 from being merged.
- Added a
check-formatnpm script that uses Prettier to verify code formatting - Created a new
formatjob in the test workflow that runs the formatting check on every push and pull request
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| package.json | Added check-format script to verify code formatting using Prettier |
| .github/workflows/test.yaml | Added new format job to CI pipeline that runs formatting checks |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Collaborator
|
Thanks |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For avoiding #68 in the future (#68 needs to be merged before this so that the
formatworkflow checks)