Skip to content

Conversation

@hiyuchang
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

[Please describe the background, purpose, changes made, and how to test this PR]

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has passed all tests
  • Docstrings have been added/updated in Google Style
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Code is ready for review

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @hiyuchang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request improves the project's documentation accuracy and enhances configuration robustness. It addresses a minor typo in the align_with_verl.md tutorial, ensuring consistency in the selector_type setting across both English and Chinese documentation. Additionally, a new validation step has been introduced to proactively check the validity of task_selector.selector_type configurations, preventing potential runtime issues caused by unsupported selector types.

Highlights

  • Documentation Typo Fix: Corrected a typo in both the English and Chinese versions of the align_with_verl.md tutorial, changing selector_type:random to the correct selector_type:shuffle.
  • Selector Type Validation: Implemented a new validation check in trinity/common/config.py to ensure that the configured task_selector.selector_type is a supported selector, raising a ValueError if an unrecognized type is provided.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a typo fix in the documentation and adds a validation check for the task selector type in the configuration. The documentation change correctly updates random to shuffle. The new validation logic in trinity/common/config.py is a good addition for robustness, ensuring that only supported selectors are used. However, I've noted a minor performance and style issue with an import statement being placed inside a loop. Moving it outside the loop would be an improvement.

@pan-x-c pan-x-c merged commit 2f1a587 into modelscope:main Dec 12, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants