Skip to content

Conversation

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Collaborator

@pan-x-c pan-x-c commented Dec 22, 2025

Description

As the title says

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has passed all tests
  • Docstrings have been added/updated in Google Style
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Code is ready for review

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @pan-x-c, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the flexibility of the system by introducing the ability to pass custom runtime environments to the Ray actors for the Explorer and Trainer components. This change allows for more dynamic and isolated execution contexts, which can be crucial for managing dependencies or specific environment variables required by these services.

Highlights

  • Runtime Environment Support: The get_actor methods for both the Explorer and Trainer classes now accept an optional runtime_env dictionary. This allows users to specify custom Ray runtime environments when creating these actors.
  • Ray Actor Configuration: The provided runtime_env is passed directly to the ray.remote().options() call, enabling fine-grained control over the execution environment of the Explorer and Trainer actors.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces support for passing runtime_env to the explorer and trainer Ray actors. The changes are clear and directly implement the intended functionality. My review includes two main points. First, for consistency with the existing codebase, I've recommended using Dict from the typing module for type hints. Second, I've suggested adding test cases to verify that the runtime_env is correctly applied to the actors, which will help ensure the new functionality is robust and prevent future regressions. Overall, this is a good and useful addition.

Comment on lines +497 to 507
def get_actor(cls, config: Config, runtime_env: Optional[dict] = None):
"""Get a Ray actor for the explorer."""
return (
ray.remote(cls)
.options(
name=config.explorer.name,
namespace=ray.get_runtime_context().namespace,
runtime_env=runtime_env,
)
.remote(config)
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The change to support runtime_env is a good addition. However, the new functionality is not covered by tests. To ensure its correctness and prevent future regressions, please consider adding a test case that verifies the runtime_env is correctly passed to the Ray actor. For example, you could pass an environment variable and check its value inside the actor.

Comment on lines +219 to 229
def get_actor(cls, config: Config, runtime_env: Optional[dict] = None):
"""Get a Ray actor for the trainer."""
return (
ray.remote(cls)
.options(name=config.trainer.name, namespace=ray.get_runtime_context().namespace)
.options(
name=config.trainer.name,
namespace=ray.get_runtime_context().namespace,
runtime_env=runtime_env,
)
.remote(config)
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Similar to the explorer, this change to support runtime_env for the trainer actor is useful. To improve the robustness of the code, it would be beneficial to add a test case to ensure it works as expected.

@pan-x-c pan-x-c closed this Dec 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant