Skip to content

SK-3002 Flowvault release/26.8.1 - #387

Merged
skyflow-bharti merged 51 commits into
release/26.8.1from
flowvault-release/26.8.1
Aug 2, 2026
Merged

SK-3002 Flowvault release/26.8.1#387
skyflow-bharti merged 51 commits into
release/26.8.1from
flowvault-release/26.8.1

Conversation

@skyflow-bharti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Start with a concise summary of the PR. The first three sections are required. The questions present in each section is there to help you guide you what to add. They are meant to be overwritten by your comments.

Why

  • Why are you making the change?
  • What is the underlying issue that you are trying to case, in case of fix?
  • Why is it needed by the feature you are working on?
  • What is the intent behind making the change?

Goal

  • What is the intended outcome?
  • What part of the feature should start working?
  • What are the non-goals or will be covered in future PR?

Testing

  • How was the code tested?
  • If you haven't written unit tests, why?
  • What more testing is needed? Do you intend to manually test it after deployment?
  • Do you have any concerns if this changed is released to prod?

Tech debt

  • Is the PR adding to tech debt in any way?
  • Are you addressing some Tech debt in this PR?
  • If both the above are false, feel free to remove this section.

skyflow-bharti and others added 30 commits July 10, 2026 14:25
…rt-using-modular-build-approach

# Conflicts:
#	common/src/main/java/com/skyflow/utils/BaseUtils.java
#	pom.xml
…vault-api-support-using-modular-build-approach

SK-2967 java sdk add flow db vault api support using modular build approach
…vault-api-support-using-modular-build-approach

SK-2967 update the internal release
…vault-api-support-using-modular-build-approach

SK-2967 update script version
…vault-api-support-using-modular-build-approach

SK-2967 update internal release workflow
…vault-api-support-using-modular-build-approach

SK-2967 java sdk add flow db vault api support using modular build approach
…vault-api-support-using-modular-build-approach

SK-2967 fix internal release workflows
skyflow-bharti and others added 21 commits July 20, 2026 08:57
…low-db-vault-api-support-using-modular-build-approach
The Codecov step uploaded target/site/jacoco/jacoco.xml, which was
correct when this repo was a single Maven module. Since the
common/v2/flowvault split the root pom is <packaging>pom</packaging>
with no sources, so that file is never generated - codecov received
nothing and reported no coverage for the PR.

Verified locally: 'mvn -B package -f pom.xml' produces reports only at
common/, v2/ and flowvault/ target/site/jacoco/jacoco.xml; the root
path does not exist.

Same class of issue as the 'Distribute test fixtures to modules' step
already added on this branch - a repo-root path left over from the
single-module layout.
Every individual_component path was rooted at src/main/java/..., which
was correct when this was a single Maven module. Sources now live at
<module>/src/main/java/..., so all 11 component globs matched zero
files and each component reported no coverage data - which is the
'no coverage reports found' seen on the PR.

The uploaded report itself was fine: the Codecov API shows state
'complete' for c1c5719 with 115 files at 91.75% (v2 55, common 30,
flowvault 30), correctly path-resolved. Only the component matching
was broken.

Prefixed each glob with **/ so components aggregate a functional area
across all modules, matching the previous semantics. Quoted because a
bare leading * is a YAML alias.

Verified against the real file list from the Codecov API: 0 components
match zero files (was 11/11).
…-changes-for-insert-and-detokenize

SK-3026 internal release for insert and detokenize added according to doc
@skyflow-bharti skyflow-bharti changed the title Flowvault release/26.8.1 SK-3002 Flowvault release/26.8.1 Aug 2, 2026
@skyflow-bharti skyflow-bharti reopened this Aug 2, 2026
@skyflow-bharti
skyflow-bharti merged commit f933cfa into release/26.8.1 Aug 2, 2026
18 of 21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants