Skip to content

Conversation

@andrewrobinsonhodges-snyk
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Provide description of this PR and changes, if linked Jira ticket doesn't cover it in full.

Checklist

  • Tests added and all succeed
  • Regenerated mocks, etc. (make generate)
  • Linted (make lint-fix)
  • README.md updated, if user-facing
  • License file updated, if new 3rd-party dependency is introduced

@snyk-io
Copy link

snyk-io bot commented Nov 19, 2025

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @andrewrobinsonhodges-snyk, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the robustness and clarity of the codebase, particularly concerning how organization configurations are managed within delta scans and CLI extension executions. It ensures that base branch scans correctly utilize folder-specific organization settings, preventing potential inconsistencies. Additionally, the changes include general code hygiene improvements such as optimizing logging practices and refining function signatures for better maintainability, alongside a minor but important update to a related test case.

Highlights

  • Delta Scan Organization Configuration: The populateOrgForScannedFolderConfig function in base_scan.go was refactored to explicitly accept the configuration object and now includes improved comments explaining its role in ensuring consistent organization settings for base branch scans during delta scan operations. Error handling and debug logging were also added for retrieving folder configurations.
  • Logging Refinement: Logging within cli_extension_executor.go was improved by centralizing the logger instantiation at the beginning of the Execute and doExecute methods, leading to cleaner and more consistent log statements.
  • Test Coverage Enhancement: An additional assertion was added to cli_extension_executor_test.go to explicitly verify that the global organization flag is not included in command arguments when a folder-specific organization is successfully applied.
  • Function Signature Cleanup: The Scan function in iac.go was updated to mark an unused folderConfig parameter as anonymous, improving code clarity.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request tidies up comments, logging, and function signatures, which improves code clarity and maintainability. The changes are mostly good, especially the refactoring of logging to use a structured approach and the improved error handling. However, I found one issue in the logging refactoring where an incorrect error variable is being used, which could lead to misleading logs.

Copy link
Contributor

@rrama rrama left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just fix the issue Gemini found.

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants