-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
chore: tidy up comments, logging and function signatures for delta scans #1074
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.
💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse. |
Summary of ChangesHello @andrewrobinsonhodges-snyk, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on enhancing the robustness and clarity of the codebase, particularly concerning how organization configurations are managed within delta scans and CLI extension executions. It ensures that base branch scans correctly utilize folder-specific organization settings, preventing potential inconsistencies. Additionally, the changes include general code hygiene improvements such as optimizing logging practices and refining function signatures for better maintainability, alongside a minor but important update to a related test case. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request tidies up comments, logging, and function signatures, which improves code clarity and maintainability. The changes are mostly good, especially the refactoring of logging to use a structured approach and the improved error handling. However, I found one issue in the logging refactoring where an incorrect error variable is being used, which could lead to misleading logs.
rrama
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just fix the issue Gemini found.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Description
Provide description of this PR and changes, if linked Jira ticket doesn't cover it in full.
Checklist
make generate)make lint-fix)