Add learning rate config support for Moonshot Kimi models #200
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
The
get_lr()function inhyperparam_utils.pywas missing support for Moonshot Kimi models, causing it to fail with anAssertionErrorwhen users tried to get learning rate recommendations formoonshotai/Kimi-K2-Thinking.This PR adds the missing configuration:
Uses specific model name matching (
moonshotai/Kimi-K2andkimi-k2) to avoid conflicts if Moonshot releases other model families in the future.Test plan
get_lr("moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Thinking")returns a valid learning rate instead of raising an errorNote on exponent value
The exponent value (0.0775) is based on Qwen's MoE models since Kimi-K2 is also an MoE architecture. The existing exponents for Llama (0.781) and Qwen (0.0775) were empirically derived through hyperparameter sweeps. A follow-up eval run would help validate this is optimal for Kimi-K2 specifically.
Related to thinking-machines-lab/tinker-feedback#49