(Chore): Support overriding codeowners type

[TylerJang27]

--codeowners-type or TRUNK_CODEOWNERS_TYPE. Formerly we were trying GitLab and falling back to GitHub format. Some CODEOWNERS files are "cross-compatible" to the point where we weren't falling back

I verified on the customer's CODEOWNERS file and the proper files were parsed

Related:

• Swap codeowners parsing order #222
• [codeowners] Support specifying codeowners source #726

[trunk-io]

😎 Merged successfully - details.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 71.59091% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 81.85%. Comparing base (bddc7a9) to head (2bf9a6a).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
codeowners/src/main.rs	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
cli/src/upload_command.rs	16.66%	5 Missing ⚠️
test_report/src/report.rs	42.85%	4 Missing ⚠️
codeowners/src/codeowners.rs	92.85%	3 Missing ⚠️
cli/src/validate_command.rs	94.11%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1053      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.54%   81.85%   +0.31%     
==========================================
  Files          69       69              
  Lines       14691    14790      +99     
==========================================
+ Hits        11980    12107     +127     
+ Misses       2711     2683      -28     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[trunk-staging-io]

     

View Full Report ↗︎ ⋅ Docs

[trunk-io]

     

View Full Report ↗︎ ⋅ Docs

[dfrankland]

This doesn't improve ingestion though, does it?